Russell Sims Aquatic Center master plan approved

RUSSELL SIMS AQUATIC CENTER MASTER PLAN

BOWLING GREEN, Ky. (WNKY) — Bowling Green city commissioners approved a long-term master plan Tuesday for Russell Sims Aquatic Center, outlining possible upgrades to the 27-year-old facility.

The plan includes a new lazy river, splash pad, dining space and other amenities. Tuesday’s vote approved the plan itself, not funding for the individual projects. City officials said those decisions could begin during the fiscal year 2028 budget process.

Existing facility can remain

George Deines of Councilman Hunsaker, an aquatic design firm, told commissioners the aquatic center remains in good condition despite its age.

“I think the biggest thing was that it has been well taken care of by the city and their team,” Deines said. “It was evident from the beginning, but we don’t see some of the issues that we might typically see with a 25 year old facility.”

The design team said the facility has not reached the end of its useful life, allowing the city to keep much of the existing aquatic center while adding new features.

Community input shaped the plan

Consultants gathered feedback online and spoke with people at the park as they developed the proposal.

During one visit, the design team spent four hours talking with children about what they enjoy at the aquatic center and what they would like to see added. The existing pool and water slides were among the popular features discussed.

Renderings presented to commissioners showed a new splash pad and lazy river. A dining area was also included in the discussion.

Consultants estimated roughly $7 million to $10 million in improvements during the first five years, depending on the city’s budget. The projects would be completed in phases.

Funding still undecided

None of the projects in the new master plan are currently funded.

Officials said the only pool-related capital project in the current budget involves work on the pool bottom. Larger improvements would require future budget action.

The city also discussed grants, sponsorships and setting aside money over multiple budget years as possible ways to pay for the work.

Which projects are built first, and when construction could begin, will depend on those future funding decisions.